![](/jspui/image/bnner.jpg)
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/433
Title: | Mindful consumption: Its conception, measurement, and implications |
Authors: | Gupta, Sharad |
Keywords: | Mindful consumption |
Issue Date: | 2023 |
Publisher: | Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science |
Abstract: | Most traditional marketers avoid using mindful consumption (MC) despite fast-rising consumer mindfulness, MC-advocation by trade magazines, and the success of tech-savvy, MC-oriented start-ups. We identify two gaps for this divergence—varying conceptions of MC and lack of a valid MC scale. Conception clarity and a valid MC scale are important for advancing managerial practice. We frst integrate current, varying conceptions to identify three MC dimensions: Awareness, Caring, and Temperance. These signify awareness of self, society, and the environment (SSE), caring for the efects of consumption on SSE, and temperance in consumption. We then develop, refne, and validate the MC scale using 10 studies. We also assess the MC nomological network and scale robustness across genders, ages, occupations, and incomes. Marketers can use MC scale for product innovation, diferentiation, and diversifcation. Policymakers can use this to nudge people towards MC-oriented sustainable behavior. This research opens multiple avenues for future research. |
Description: | Mindful consumption (MC) is the manifestation of mindfulness in consumer decision-making (Bahl et al., 2016). Rising interest in MC over last two decades is evident in doctoral studies (Armstrong, 2012; De wet, 2008; Gupta, 2019), and academic inquiries in the form of conceptual (Sheth et al., 2011), qualitative (Hunting & Conroy, 2018), and quantitative (Milne et al., 2020) articles. This resembles the growing emphasis on MC in practice-oriented articles (Clark, 2014; Kotler, 2021; Mitchell, 2019) as well as books (Badiner, 2002; Emerich, 2011; Turner, 2020). Some technology-driven marketers realize the importance of MC and maintain it at the core of their novel business models, enabling consumers to buy the product they need, when and however little they may need it (Aronson, 2021). For example, start-ups, such as Rent the Runway and GoPuf, challenge traditional marketing techniques (e.g., discounts, bundling, and conditioning) that promote overconsumption (Kadioglu & Ozturk, 2022; Rosenberg, 2004). These marketers base their business models on MC to achieve over $1 billion in market cap (Fromm, 2019). Despite these trends, integrating mindfulness into marketing is tough for traditional marketers (Hagenbuch, 2022; Tiland, 2019), which is evident in never-ending discounts, click baits, and zero pricing manipulations (Fan et al., 2022; Mukherjee et al., 2022) for pushing excessive consumption. This divergence of traditional marketers to avoid MC despite the rise in consumer mindfulness, widespread reinforcements by marketing experts, and the success of MC-oriented new marketers is surprising. We examine the literature to identify the two important challenges that marketing practice faces to integrate MC in marketing strategies. |
URI: | http://localhost:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/433 |
Appears in Collections: | PGDM |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sharad Gupta.pdf | 300.39 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.